October 12th, 2022 | RESEARCH
As evidence synthesis methodologies, particularly systematic reviews (SRs), continue to gain popularity across social science research disciplines, faculty requests for librarian assistance with literature searchers are also increasing. A critical component of a well-developed systematic review is a robust grey literature search. Grey literature provides access to research outside of traditional publishing streams, such as conference proceedings, government reports, or project reports, and thus is especially important when research involves specific populations who are historically underrepresented in empirical research, such as minoritized populations. While SRs follow well established guidelines for searching and reporting results from published literature, the same level of transparency for grey literature is frequently absent. Based on experiences from a recent SR involving a minoritized population, this article presents recommendations to facilitate discussions between librarians and researchers about preparing for the inclusion of grey literature if the SR is conducted on a minoritized population.
Document
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0099133322001422?via%3Dihub
Team Members
Michele Lee, Author, Northern Arizona UniversityAmy Hughes, Author, Northern Arizona University
Catherine Lockmiller, Author, Northern Arizona University
Arden Day, Author, Northern Arizona University
Meredith Brown, Author, Northern Arizona University
Ronda Jenson, Author, Northern Arizona University
Citation
Publication: The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Volume: 49
Number: 6
Page(s): 102626
Funders
Funding Source: NSF
Funding Program: AISL
Award Number: 2115542
Related URLs
Tags
Access and Inclusion: People with Disabilities
Audience: Evaluators | Learning Researchers | Scientists | Undergraduate | Graduate Students
Discipline: Engineering | General STEM
Resource Type: Peer-reviewed article | Research | Research Case Study | Research Products