Participating in the scientific publication process: Exploring students’ perceptions of scientific inquiry and identity

March 23rd, 2020 | RESEARCH

Communication is an essential component to scientific inquiry, and specifically the primary literature is highly valued by scientists. Yet, the role of primary literature within scientific inquiry is generally absent from the science classroom. In this study we examined how middle and high school student perceptions of scientific inquiry changed after they engaged in a peer-review and publication process of their research papers. We interviewed twelve students who published their papers in the [Journal], a science journal dedicated to publishing the research of middle and high school students. Students reported a broader understanding of scientific inquiry, and explicitly recognized the important roles of effective communication, revision, and collaboration in doing science. While not all students will be motivated to publish their research, our work has important implications for how the concepts of peer-review and publication should be integrated into disciplinary literacy and scientific inquiry. 

Document

NARST-2020-Fankhauser.pdf

Team Members

Sarah Fankhauser, Author, Emory University
Gwendolynne Reid, Author, Emory University
Gwendolyn Mirzoyan, Author, Emory University
Clara Meaders, Author, Cornell University
Olivia Ho-Shing, Author, Harvard University

Citation

Publication: NARST 2020

Tags

Audience: Educators | Teachers | Learning Researchers | Middle School Children (11-13) | Museum | ISE Professionals | Youth | Teen (up to 17)
Discipline: General STEM | Nature of science
Resource Type: Conference Proceedings | Reference Materials
Environment Type: Comics | Books | Newspapers | Informal | Formal Connections | K-12 Programs | Media and Technology | Websites | Mobile Apps | Online Media