July 1st, 2025 | EVALUATION
This report assesses how the Molly Community Science project implemented the co-design process by evaluating it against the following indicators:
- Equity: reduction or removal of barriers to active participation of all members in a co-design process.
- Trust and respect: skills, expression, and knowledge systems are trusted and respected as having value to the project.
- Relationships: valuing connectedness and long-term relationships beyond the scope of a project.
- Capacity: Indigenous members have appropriate supports and tools to feel empowered through the process.
- Deliberate and intentional decision-making: decisions are thorough, equitable, and made iteratively, reframing power inequities.
Goldstream Group used evaluator observation notes, document reviews, and interviews with co-design team members to assess how the Molly Community Science project co- design process demonstrated an understanding of equitable co-design principles, and to provide recommendations for future co-design projects.
Document
Molly-Community-Science-Process-Report-Exec-Summary.pdf
Team Members
Goldstream Group, Evaluator, Goldstream GroupFunders
Funding Source: NSF
Funding Program: ITEST
Award Number: 2049767
Related URLs
Tags
Audience: Administration | Leadership | Policymakers | Educators | Teachers | Elementary School Children (6-10) | Evaluators | Families | General Public | Learning Researchers | Museum | ISE Professionals | Parents | Caregivers | Scientists | Youth | Teen (up to 17)
Discipline: Climate | Ecology | forestry | agriculture | Life science
Resource Type: Evaluation | Summative
Environment Type: Afterschool Programs | Broadcast Media | Community Outreach Programs | Informal | Formal Connections | Media and Technology | Public Programs | Summer and Extended Camps | Websites | Mobile Apps | Online Media