December 17th, 2019 | EVALUATION
This evaluation brief summarizes the kinds of formative feedback and resources that Rockman et al evaluators provided to inform content and marketing of two science cafés, and support the construction, refinement, and dissemination of a questionnaire about café participants understanding of Science Technology and Society (STS). REA staff members served as educational assessment consultants who worked with the project team to (a) qualitatively assess the validity of and refine the constructs for the science café assessment tool; and (b) construct and refine the summative assessment questionnaire. The evaluators also conducted a focus group with five members of Richmond’s African American community, and reviewed drafts of project deliverables such as a conference poster and a research manuscript. This brief shares examples of these evaluation activities and the ways in which the PI incorporated the evaluators’ feedback in project activities and deliverables.
Document
Summary-of-Evaluation-Activities-for-VCU-NSF-AISL-1611953.pdf
Team Members
Kristin Bass, Evaluator, Rockman et alFunders
Funding Source: NSF
Funding Program: AISL
Award Number: 1611953
Related URLs
Science Cafes: Modeling and Assessing a Structured Adult Informal Science Education Program
Tags
Audience: Adults | Evaluators | Museum | ISE Professionals | Scientists
Discipline: General STEM
Resource Type: Evaluation Reports | Summative
Environment Type: Public Events and Festivals | Public Programs