March 1st, 2013 | RESEARCH
This article discusses competing models of afterschool programming. It points out the weaknesses of the additive model and concludes that the contextual model is advantageous in fostering STEM learning environments. It encourages cross-setting approaches in the design, development, and documentation of out-of-school activities.
Document
(no document provided)
Team Members
Bronwyn Bevan, Author, The ExploratoriumVera Michalchik, Author, SRI International
Citation
Publication: Afterschool Matters
Volume: 17
Page(s): 1
Funders
Related URLs
Tags
Audience: Educators | Teachers | Museum | ISE Professionals
Discipline: Education and learning science | Engineering | General STEM | Mathematics | Technology
Resource Type: Peer-reviewed article | Research Products
Environment Type: Afterschool Programs | Public Programs