Real science is excellent science – how to interpret post-academic science, Mode 2 and the ERC

December 21st, 2006 | RESEARCH

When thinking about this contribution, an homage to John Ziman, one question occurred to me repeatedly: what would John have made of the European Research Council? Here is a newly established institution with the sole objective to fund ‘frontier research’ at EU level, based exclusively on scientific excellence and subject to pan-European competition of the best researchers. Would he have interpreted it as a vindication of academic science as a culture, a deliberate turning away from ‘post-academic science’ or even of overcoming it? Or, would he have seen it as the establishment of a small niche, to be recognized (and praised) for its respect for the norms of academic science, whose wider impact still has to be seen?

Document

(no document provided)

Team Members

Helga Nowotny, Author, ETH Zurich

Citation

Identifier Type: ISSN
Identifier: 1824-2049

Publication: Journal of Science Communication
Volume: 5
Number: 4

Related URLs

Full Text

Tags

Audience: Administration | Leadership | Policymakers | Scientists
Discipline: General STEM | Nature of science
Resource Type: Mass Media Article | Reference Materials
Environment Type: Higher Education Programs | Informal | Formal Connections | Media and Technology