The public way to peer-review

March 21st, 2004 | RESEARCH

There is a substantial divergence between the standards of integrity associated with "good science" and the problems imposed by the conflict of interest on research, specially in the biomedical field. There are at least as many ways in which information may be altered and the production of new scientific knowledge may be affected as there are links that can be established between researchers, private companies, and editors and staff of the specialized press. The pressures resulting from this high number of connections can affect all stages of research, from trial design to data analysis, from result publishing and dissemination to who will be the author of the articles.

Document

(no document provided)

Team Members

Nico Pitrelli, Author, ISAS

Citation

Identifier Type: ISSN
Identifier: 1824-2049

Publication: Journal of Science Communication
Volume: 3
Number: 1

Related URLs

Full Text

Tags

Audience: General Public | Scientists
Discipline: General STEM | Nature of science
Resource Type: Peer-reviewed article | Research Products
Environment Type: Broadcast Media | Comics | Books | Newspapers | Higher Education Programs | Informal | Formal Connections | Media and Technology | Websites | Mobile Apps | Online Media