January 1st, 2012 | RESEARCH
Mueller, Tippins, and Bryan's contrast of the current limitations of science education with the potential virtues of citizen science provides an important theoretical perspective about the future of democratized science and K-12 education. However, the authors fail to adequately address the existing barriers and constraints to moving community-based science into the classroom. We contend that for these science partnerships to be successful, teachers, researchers, and other program designers must reexamine questions about traditional science education and citizen-science programs and attend to certain dimensions, including: framing these projects around the nature of science, creating a dialog with experts and allowing access to the primary literature, and fostering the ability of the public to critique information and evidence. We argue that the resource constraints of scientists, teachers, and students likely pose problems to moving true democratized science into the classroom. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Document
(no document provided)
Team Members
Steven Gray, Author, University of HawaiiKristina Nicosia, Author, West Windsor-Plainsboro High School North
Rebecca Jordan, Author, Rutgers University
Citation
Identifier Type: ISSN
Identifier: 1085-3545
Publication: Democracy & Education
Volume: 20
Number: 2
Page(s): 1
Related URLs
Tags
Audience: Educators | Teachers | Elementary School Children (6-10) | Evaluators | Middle School Children (11-13) | Museum | ISE Professionals | Scientists | Youth | Teen (up to 17)
Discipline: Education and learning science | General STEM | Nature of science
Resource Type: Peer-reviewed article | Research Products
Environment Type: Citizen Science Programs | Informal | Formal Connections | K-12 Programs | Public Programs