January 1st, 2015 | RESEARCH
Summative evaluation plays a critical role in documenting the impacts of informal science education (ISE), potentially contributing to the ISE knowledge base and informing ongoing improvements in practice and decision-making. In response to the growing demand for capacity-building in ISE evaluation, this paper presents a framework for summative evaluation based on an extensive review of literature and research-based refinements. The framework synthesizes key elements of high-quality summative evaluation into three dimensions: (a) Intervention Rationale, (b) Methodological Rigor and Appropriateness, and (c) Evaluation Uses. Judgment of the value of the intervention (e.g., program, exhibition) should draw upon all three dimensions.
Document
(no document provided)
Team Members
Alice Fu, Author, SK PartnersLisa Peterson, Author, SK Partners
Archana Kannan, Author, SK Partners
Richard Shavelson, Author, Stanford University
Amy Kurpius, Author, SK Partners
Citation
Identifier Type: ISSN
Identifier: 1934-7715
Identifier Type: DOI
Identifier: 10.1080/10645578.2015.1016363
Publication: Visitor Studies
Volume: 18
Number: 1
Page(s): 17
Related URLs
Full Text
Enhancing Informal Science Learning Initiatives: Developing Measurement and Evaluation Capacities
Tags
Audience: Evaluators | Museum | ISE Professionals
Discipline: Education and learning science | General STEM | Social science and psychology
Resource Type: Peer-reviewed article | Reference Materials
Environment Type: Exhibitions | Informal | Formal Connections | Media and Technology | Professional Development | Conferences | Networks | Public Programs