January 1st, 1997 | RESEARCH
Both metacognitive and associative models have been proposed to account for children’s strategy discovery and use. Models based on only metacognitive or only associative mechanisms cannot entirely account for the observed mix of variability and constraint revealed by recent microgenetic studies of children’s strategy change. We propose a new approach where metacognitive and associative mechanisms interact in a competitive negotiation. This approach provides the flexibility to model the observed variability and constraint.
Document
(no document provided)
Team Members
Kevin Crowley, Author, University of PittsburghJeff Schrager, Author, University of Pittsburgh
Robert Siegler, Author, Carnegie-Mellon University
Citation
Identifier Type: ISSN
Identifier: 0273-2297
Publication: Developmental Review
Volume: 17
Page(s): 462
Related URLs
Tags
Audience: Elementary School Children (6-10) | Evaluators | Museum | ISE Professionals | Pre-K Children (0-5) | Scientists
Discipline: Education and learning science
Resource Type: Peer-reviewed article | Research Products
Environment Type: Public Programs