Strategy Discovery as a Competitive Negotiation between Metacognitive and Associative Mechanisms

January 1st, 1997 | RESEARCH

Both metacognitive and associative models have been proposed to account for children’s strategy discovery and use. Models based on only metacognitive or only associative mechanisms cannot entirely account for the observed mix of variability and constraint revealed by recent microgenetic studies of children’s strategy change. We propose a new approach where metacognitive and associative mechanisms interact in a competitive negotiation. This approach provides the flexibility to model the observed variability and constraint.

Document

(no document provided)

Team Members

Kevin Crowley, Author, University of Pittsburgh
Jeff Schrager, Author, University of Pittsburgh
Robert Siegler, Author, Carnegie-Mellon University

Citation

Identifier Type: ISSN
Identifier: 0273-2297

Publication: Developmental Review
Volume: 17
Page(s): 462

Related URLs

Full Text

Tags

Audience: Elementary School Children (6-10) | Evaluators | Museum | ISE Professionals | Pre-K Children (0-5) | Scientists
Discipline: Education and learning science
Resource Type: Peer-reviewed article | Research Products
Environment Type: Public Programs