The NRC and NSF frameworks for characterizing learning in informal settings: comparisons and possibilities for integration

November 30th, 2012 | RESEARCH

Recent work in the informal science education (ISE) field has begun to systematically categorize aspects of learning in a variety of ways. Most notable are the “Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Informal Science Education” (Friedman, A. (Ed.), 2008, henceforth ‘NSF’) and “Learning Science in Informal Environments” (LSIE, National Research Council, 2009, henceforth ‘NRC’). Both frameworks have potential implications for assessment as well as project planning.

Document

(no document provided)

Team Members

Sue Allen, Author, Allen & Associates
Rick Bonney, Author, Cornell Lab of Ornithology

Related URLs

Full Text from National Academies

Tags

Audience: Educators | Teachers | Evaluators | Museum | ISE Professionals
Discipline: Education and learning science | General STEM
Resource Type: Reference Materials | Report
Environment Type: Professional Development | Conferences | Networks | Professional Development and Workshops