Characteristics and Dimensions of Professional Development Frameworks: How emerging fields of expert knowledge identify and advance the competencies of professionals in those fields. A review and comparison of Professional Learning Frameworks

December 1st, 2017 | RESEARCH

This purpose of this review was to identify characteristics common across professional development frameworks within emerging professions (i.e. fields that are not regulated or licensed) and to identify practices and heuristics from those fields that could inform our work. The review began with; 1) creating a protocol for searching for frameworks; 2) identifying criteria for selection of representative frameworks; and 3) developing strategies for recording and sharing content with the research team. From the initial inventory of frameworks, we articulated a set of criteria for selecting a handful of professional frameworks to review. Five frameworks were selected for systematic review.

Document

Review-of-Frameworks-2017.pdf

Team Members

kris morrissey, Author, University of Washington
Kirsten Gausch, Author
Dennis Schatz, Author, Pacific Science Center

Funders

Funding Source: NSF
Funding Program: AISL
Award Number: 1514890

Funding Source: NSF
Funding Program: AISL
Award Number: 1514884

Funding Source: NSF
Funding Program: AISL
Award Number: 1514815

Funding Source: NSF
Funding Program: AISL
Award Number: 1515315

Related URLs

Collaborative Research: An Evidence-based Informal STEM Learning (ISL) Professional Framework
Video - Informal STEM Learning (ISL) Professional Framework

Tags

Audience: Evaluators | Museum | ISE Professionals
Discipline: Education and learning science | General STEM
Resource Type: Reference Materials | Report
Environment Type: Professional Development | Conferences | Networks | Professional Development and Workshops