While changes in the “how” are exciting, changes in the “how much” could be exasperating

March 21st, 2013 | RESEARCH

In terms of efficiency, managing the effects of overpublising (the sheer volume of new papers published each week) has become seriously challenging for science communication researchers. This comment analyzes causes and consequences of this situation and proposes to research journals to take into considerations the following elements: a) special attention to headline and abstract, b) more visible and updated keywords and c) a clear structure of content and a shortening of the average number of pages per paper.

Document

(no document provided)

Team Members

Gema Revuelta, Author

Citation

Identifier Type: issn
Identifier: 1824-2049

Publication: Journal of Science Communication
Volume: 12
Number: 1

Related URLs

Full Text

Tags

Audience: General Public | Museum | ISE Professionals | Scientists
Discipline: General STEM
Resource Type: Mass Media Article | Reference Materials
Environment Type: Media and Technology | Professional Development | Conferences | Networks | Websites | Mobile Apps | Online Media

Linkedin   Youtube   Facebook   Instagram
Search: repository | repository and website pages | website pages
NSF logo

This material is supported by National Science Foundation award DRL-2229061, with previous support under DRL-1612739, DRL-1842633, DRL-1212803, and DRL-0638981. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations contained within InformalScience.org are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.

NSF AISL Project Meetings

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Us