Let’s Hear It for Mr. Occam: A Reply to Bitgood and Shettel on Remedial Evaluation

September 1st, 1994 | RESEARCH

In this article, Roger Miles, of the Natural History Museum in London, defends his 1993 proposal that deems the concept of remedial evaluation unnecessary. Miles presents counterarguments against proponents of remedial evaluation, Screven, Bitgood, and Shettel and argues for a classification based on the cyclical model of exhibition development.

Document

VSA-a0a1r4-a_5730.pdf

Team Members

Roger Miles, Author, Natural History Museum, London

Citation

Identifier Type: ISSN
Identifier: 0892-4996

Publication: Visitor Behavior
Volume: 9
Number: 3
Page(s): 4

Tags

Audience: Evaluators | General Public | Museum | ISE Professionals
Discipline: Education and learning science
Resource Type: Peer-reviewed article | Research Products
Environment Type: Exhibitions | Museum and Science Center Exhibits