Formal Versus Naturalistic Evaluation in the Museum Context

January 1st, 1990 | RESEARCH

In this paper, Jeff Bonner of the St. Louis Science Center discusses the merits of formal versus naturalistic evaluation within the museum context. Bonner also presents the approach and findings of a two-part study designed to compare the results of these two evaluation approaches. They compared the the results of a formal analysis of the holding power, ease of use, readability of text, and overall enjoyability of nine exhibits with a naturalistic study focused on how one volunteer, two part-time employees and a staff supervisor viewed the same exhibits.

Document

(no document provided)

Team Members

Jeff Bonner, Author, St. Louis Science Center

Citation

Identifier Type: ISSN
Identifier: 1064-5578

Publication: Visitor Studies
Volume: 2
Number: 1
Page(s): 211-224

Related URLs

Full Text

Tags

Audience: Evaluators | General Public | Museum | ISE Professionals
Discipline: Education and learning science | Engineering | General STEM | Geoscience and geography | Life science | Physics | Technology
Resource Type: Peer-reviewed article | Research Products
Environment Type: Exhibitions | Museum and Science Center Exhibits